The Variation of Court Orders
Written by: Robyn Shepherd, SchoemanLaw Inc Save to Instapaper
By Robyn Shepherd
Category: Civil Litigation
Introduction
It is the task of a Magistrate or Judge to determine the outcome of a matter before a court. This decision will then be confirmed as an order of Court to ensure all relevant parties are made aware of the terms and conditions of the outcome and to ensure compliance with same.
It may occur that one of the parties at a stage subsequent to the Court Order being granted, feels that the provisions in the Court Order has prejudiced them or that a certain clause in the Court Order requires clarification and/or alterations. The Court Order, in these instances, may be varied, elaborated on, changed or amended in these instances as requested. Only a final Court Order can be varied, and this does not extend to an interim order where the final order is still dependent upon the finalization of specific provisions.
There are various grounds for a variation application, including but not limited to fraud, undue influence or excessive pressure to sign or agree to certain provisions. In the matter of Gollach & Gomperts v Universal Mills and Produce Co 1978 (1) SA 914 (AD) it was held that a reasonable mistake on the part of either party could be used as a valid ground for variation or rescission.1
There Are Two Avenues Available Should One Wish To Vary And/Or Amend A Court Order:
The first avenue available is by way of mutual consent. This option is cost-effective as there is no formal Court application required. The consent and variation need only be placed in writing.
Secondly, where the parties are not in agreement with regard to the variation of a provision, a formal Application for Variation will have to be made to Court. An example hereof would be in terms of a divorce settlement agreement where specific provisions were set in place, and the same now needs to be altered to proceed with the sale of immovable property.
In terms of Rule 42(1) of the Uniform Rules of Court, the Court may vary or rescind the following:
an order or judgment erroneously sought or erroneously granted in the absence of any party affected thereby; an order or judgment in which there is an ambiguity, or a patent error or omission, but only to the extent of such ambiguity, error or omission; an order or judgment granted as the result of a mistake common to the parties.
Conclusion
It is clear from those above that the Court is limited to amend or rescind Court Orders however there is no reference to any timeframes to which the interested parties should adhere when bringing such an application.
Contact an attorney at SchoemanLaw for your legal needs by visiting our website at www.schoemanlaw.co.za
Robyn Shepherd
Specialist Attorney Family Law, Civil Litigation and Dispute Resolution
SchoemanLaw Inc | www.schoemanlaw.co.za
SchoemanLaw Inc Attorneys, Conveyancers and Notaries Public is a boutique law firm offering its clients access to high quality online legal documents and agreements, together with a wide range of legal services. The firm has an innovative and entrepreneurial mindset that distinguishes it from other law firms. We apply our first-hand understanding of the challenges facing entrepreneurs (regardless of their business size) to develop proven, practical solutions incorporating legal compliance, risk aversion and business sense. We achieve this by offering clients tailored, yet holistic support comprising of legal gap analysis, the design of tailored legal solutions and the practical implementation thereof through training and automation. With your personal interests in mind, our ultimate aim is to implement measures that protect the results of your hard work as effectively as possible.
Latest from
- Maintenance Agreements Between Spouses and Parents - When Contract Law Meets Family Law
- The Rise of the Gig Economy in South Africa - Challenges, Opportunities, and Legal Implications
- A Tide Turns - Western Cape High Court Sets Aside Offshore Drilling Authorization in Landmark Environmental Ruling
- Smartphones in Schools - The Legal and Policy Imperatives for South African Schools
- How Strategic Collaborations Help You Expand Without the Overheads
- The Evolving Role of the Office of the Family Advocate - Expanded Powers and Responsibilities in Divorce Matters
- Understanding South African Cybersecurity Law in the Context of the Recent SAA Cyber Incident
- Balancing Justice And Risk - Why Employers Should Appoint Independent Chairpersons
- Cyberbullying Among Children in South Africa - Legal Realities in a Digital Playground
- AI Voice Cloning – When Your Voice is no Longer Yours
- The Use Of ChatGPT In The South African Legal Fraternity - The Concerns Of Futuristic Tools.
- Default Judgment in South African Law - What It Means for Parties in a Dispute
- Cryptocurrency and Exchange Control - The Legal Implications of Standard Bank of South Africa v South African Reserve Bank and Others
- Balancing Privacy and Business Interests - The Intersection of POPIA, RICA, and Workplace Surveillance in South Africa
- Challenging a Wrongful Termination? Don’t wait too long
The Pulse Latest Articles
- Designing The Future Of Water: Hansgrohe And Axor Are Making Every Drop Count (September 16, 2025)
- Classic South African Desserts Reimagined For Modern Refreshment And Shared Tables (September 16, 2025)
- Beyond The Paycheque: A Practical Guide To Executive Compensation In Sa (September 16, 2025)
- Booty, Buff & Glow – Gloot’s Juiciest Drop Just Landed! (September 12, 2025)
- History In Motion: Springbok Women Embrace World Cup Quarterfinal Challenge (September 11, 2025)