The Variation of Court Orders
Submitted by: Robyn Shepherd, SchoemanLaw Inc Save to Instapaper
By Robyn Shepherd
Category: Civil Litigation
Introduction
It is the task of a Magistrate or Judge to determine the outcome of a matter before a court. This decision will then be confirmed as an order of Court to ensure all relevant parties are made aware of the terms and conditions of the outcome and to ensure compliance with same.
It may occur that one of the parties at a stage subsequent to the Court Order being granted, feels that the provisions in the Court Order has prejudiced them or that a certain clause in the Court Order requires clarification and/or alterations. The Court Order, in these instances, may be varied, elaborated on, changed or amended in these instances as requested. Only a final Court Order can be varied, and this does not extend to an interim order where the final order is still dependent upon the finalization of specific provisions.
There are various grounds for a variation application, including but not limited to fraud, undue influence or excessive pressure to sign or agree to certain provisions. In the matter of Gollach & Gomperts v Universal Mills and Produce Co 1978 (1) SA 914 (AD) it was held that a reasonable mistake on the part of either party could be used as a valid ground for variation or rescission.1
There Are Two Avenues Available Should One Wish To Vary And/Or Amend A Court Order:
The first avenue available is by way of mutual consent. This option is cost-effective as there is no formal Court application required. The consent and variation need only be placed in writing.
Secondly, where the parties are not in agreement with regard to the variation of a provision, a formal Application for Variation will have to be made to Court. An example hereof would be in terms of a divorce settlement agreement where specific provisions were set in place, and the same now needs to be altered to proceed with the sale of immovable property.
In terms of Rule 42(1) of the Uniform Rules of Court, the Court may vary or rescind the following:
an order or judgment erroneously sought or erroneously granted in the absence of any party affected thereby; an order or judgment in which there is an ambiguity, or a patent error or omission, but only to the extent of such ambiguity, error or omission; an order or judgment granted as the result of a mistake common to the parties.
Conclusion
It is clear from those above that the Court is limited to amend or rescind Court Orders however there is no reference to any timeframes to which the interested parties should adhere when bringing such an application.
Contact an attorney at SchoemanLaw for your legal needs by visiting our website at www.schoemanlaw.co.za
Robyn Shepherd
Specialist Attorney Family Law, Civil Litigation and Dispute Resolution
SchoemanLaw Inc | www.schoemanlaw.co.za
SchoemanLaw Inc Attorneys, Conveyancers and Notaries Public is a boutique law firm offering its clients access to high quality online legal documents and agreements, together with a wide range of legal services. The firm has an innovative and entrepreneurial mindset that distinguishes it from other law firms. We apply our first-hand understanding of the challenges facing entrepreneurs (regardless of their business size) to develop proven, practical solutions incorporating legal compliance, risk aversion and business sense. We achieve this by offering clients tailored, yet holistic support comprising of legal gap analysis, the design of tailored legal solutions and the practical implementation thereof through training and automation. With your personal interests in mind, our ultimate aim is to implement measures that protect the results of your hard work as effectively as possible.
Latest Press Articles
- Bridging Work and Home - A Conveyancing Approach to Employee Tenancies.
- Suretyships in Commercial Contracts - What Every Business Should Know
- Navigating South Africa’s Labour Law Reform - Proposed Amendments to the Labour Relations Act
- Review Applications in South African Labour Law - Legal Constraints and Procedural Discipline
- Parental Alienation in South Africa - A Silent Form of Emotional Abuse in Family Law Disputes
- Market Trust Starts Inside - Aligning Your Legal Documents with Your Marketing Message
- Exploring Suretyship - Capacity, Liabilities, and Types of Sureties.
- The "Without Prejudice" Rule Under Fire - Recent Developments in South African Law
- Navigating the Storm - How Rule 43 and Rule 58 Applications Provide a Lifeline During Divorce
- Beyond the Traditional - Execution of Judgments Through Attachment of Bank Accounts
- Guardianship vs Custody in South Africa - What Parents Need to Know When Travelling Abroad with a Minor
- What steps can I take if someone registers a domain name that is too similar to mine?
- Understanding the Revised Automotive Aftermarket Guidelines for Competition (R2R)
- Considering Artificial Intelligence, the responsibility of Employee management
- Mistake, Misrepresentation, and Duress - When Can a Business Escape a Contract?
The Pulse Updates
- New Report Reveals Msme Funding Realities In South Africa – And What Must Change (May 30, 2025)
- Opinion Piece: Incorporating Ai Into Workforce Planning (May 26, 2025)
- Bridging The Gap: Why Finance And Hr Must Collaborate For Business Success (May 19, 2025)
- Reclaiming Johannesburg’s Running Narrative Powered By The Streets. Refreshed By Pura. (May 16, 2025)
- Double Gold Triumph For Hansgrohe Innovations (May 16, 2025)