25 July 2025 4 min

AI Voice Cloning – When Your Voice is no Longer Yours

Written by: Nicolene Schoeman-Louw, SchoemanLaw Inc Save to Instapaper
AI Voice Cloning – When Your Voice is no Longer Yours

AI-powered voice cloning has moved from science fiction to reality, almost overnight. From deepfakes mimicking celebrities to cloned customer service voices, this rapidly advancing technology raises serious legal and ethical concerns.  

What Is Voice Cloning? 

Voice cloning uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to create synthetic versions of a person’s voice. With just a few seconds of audio, advanced tools can now generate highly realistic imitations. 

This technology can be used for: 

  • Entertainment and marketing 
  • Voiceovers and localization 
  • Personal assistants and customer service 
  • Criminal activities like scams and identity theft 

With increasing accessibility, however, the risk of misuse grows, particularly in fraud, defamation, impersonation, and consent violations. 

Applicable Laws 

While there is no single statute that directly addresses AI voice cloning, several existing laws indirectly apply: 

1. Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (“POPIA”) 

Voice data may be classified as biometric information under POPIA. Using someone's voice without their informed consent may amount to the unlawful processing of personal information. 

  • Section 26 prohibits processing special personal information (which includes biometric data) unless specific exceptions apply. 
  • Consent is key—without it, voice cloning would be reportable as an unlawful processing of personal information by the information regulator. 

2. Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 (“ECTA”) 

  • Section 77 provides for the issuing of take-down notices for unlawful content. If a cloned voice is used in a published deepfake or online content, victims may invoke this section to demand removal from platforms. 
  • Misleading use of cloned voices could also violate the Act’s prohibitions on unlawful interception of data (depending on how the sample voice was procured) and deceptive or fraudulent electronic communications. 

3. Common Law Doctrines: Defamation and Passing Off 

Using someone’s voice without permission—especially to endorse a product, imitate them in a misleading context, or fabricate statements—could lead to: 

  • Defamation claims arise if the impersonation damages the person’s reputation. 
  • Passing off if the cloned voice is used to impersonate a brand ambassador or individual, misleading the public and damaging goodwill. 

4. Criminal Law: Impersonation and Fraud 

Using AI voice cloning to impersonate another person (e.g., in a phone call to a bank or family member) could amount to: 

  • Fraud is used to gain access to funds or confidential information. 
  • Impersonation is a criminal offence under common law. 
  • Potential cybercrime charges, particularly under the Cybercrimes Act. 

Best Practices for Individuals and Businesses 

  1. Consent and Disclosure: Never use someone’s voice or likeness without their explicit consent—even internally. 
  1. Review Contracts: Update employment and influencer agreements to include clauses regarding the use of AI and voice/image rights. 
  1. Due Diligence: Exercise caution when receiving voice-based requests for payments or instructions, especially in high-level communications. 
  1. Cybersecurity Training: Educate teams on the risks of voice cloning and how to verify identities. 
  1. Policy Development: Companies should adopt internal policies that address the ethical use of AI, including voice technology. 

Conclusion 

Dedicated legislation on AI-generated content—including voice and image—will be critical in protecting rights and ensuring accountability. In June 2025, Denmark became the first country to give individuals the right to copyright their own facial features and voice. Under this proposed law, any unauthorized use of a person's likeness through generative AI, particularly for the creation of deepfakes, would be considered a direct copyright infringement. In South Africa, until we see further reform, businesses must tread carefully and proactively update their compliance, IP, and privacy frameworks. 

If you are interested in more information, see our interview on the Expresso Show: https://youtu.be/zxk8bZxxmpI 

At SchoemanLaw Inc., we help businesses and individuals future-proof themselves by staying ahead of these emerging legal challenges. If you are unsure whether your current contracts, policies, or digital practices comply with evolving laws on AI and data, let us talk.  

Nicolene Schoeman-Louw | SchoemanLaw Inc       

Specialist Technology, Commercial and Contract Law      

https://schoemanlaw.co.za/our-services/commercial-law/      

https://schoemanlaw.co.za/our-services/contract-drafting/       

https://schoemanlaw.co.za/our-services/technology-law-smart-contracts-and-cyber-law/

Total Words: 724

Submitted on behalf of

Press Release Submitted By

  • Agency/PR Company: SchoemanLaw Inc.
  • Contact person: Nicolene Schoeman-Louw
  • Contact #: 0214255604
  • Website
  • LinkedIn

SchoemanLaw Inc

291 Press Release Articles

SchoemanLaw Inc Attorneys, Conveyancers and Notaries Public is a boutique law firm offering its clients access to high quality online legal documents and agreements, together with a wide range of legal services. The firm has an innovative and entrepreneurial mindset that distinguishes it from other law firms. We apply our first-hand understanding of the challenges facing entrepreneurs... Read More