Warning

JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 3833
17 February 2014

Using AVE to justify you PR Worth? MADNESS!

Submitted by: Save to Instapaper

The fact that each PR person starts his or her campaign with a specific goal in mind is not contested. Where representatives from the global media differ, however, is how to measure the effectiveness of such a goal in terms of the value that has been accomplished. 

This correlates with the increase in percentage of PR budgets (according to industry analysts up to 10%) being devoted to the measurement of this value, because of pressure for PR to justify its overall budget and prove value to the bottom line of organisations, especially during the current tough economic times.

It is relatively easy to establish the number of print or broadcast clips generated for a specific client, as well as the potential audience reached and what was said. But the problem comes in actually putting a concrete value to that. One such measurement tool is advertising value equivalent (AVE) – where ‘stories’ in the regular news are converted into AVE. For example,  a five centimetre article in a magazine that charges R1000 per column per centimetre for advertising will be worth R5000 in publicity value.

This is fantastic – if the whole article was about your brand or organisation. If you only got a sentence or two, or a mere incidental mention, AVE would not represent the most accurate measuring tool.

Says Tonya Khoury, MD of DDI Africa “My view on AVE?  Well the term ‘advertising value equivalent’ implies that a news article is equal to an advertisement in terms of impact – and nobody believes that, surely. During the past few decades we have grown accustomed to using this measurement as an ‘actual value’. This is where the problem comes in, as the value or return on investment (ROI) of the actual article can either be much smaller or much greater.

We did a case study, editorial publicity that is negative cannot be compared to creative (primarily positive) advertising, and this is what AVE does. It values “paid for” media on the same benchmark as “earned” or “sort out” media. Editorial articles often contain coverage of competitors, while advertising in most cases steers clear of competitor brands, like Mercedes Benz / BMW. Editorial coverage can also be poorly positioned and presented, with ambiguous headlines in non-target or low-priority media that does not necessarily reach the target audience or markets and is thus strategically less important. AVE measures costs (if you believe everyone pays rate card rates) and not value that includes measuring the achievement or PR objectives.”

According to the Barcelona Declaration of Measurement Principles (at the European Summit on Measurement) there are seven principles of measurement, the one relating to AVE reads: ‘Advertising Value Equivalents do not measure the value of public relations and do not inform future activity. They measure the cost of media space and are rejected as a concept to value public relations.’ The world has moved away from AVE and is now increasingly using Source Rank (as one example), which entails that the circulation, readership, advertising rate and target audience are banded into groups 1-10 for mediums like print , the same methodology is used for online, except that traffic to a site, unique visitors, page impressions, time spent on a site etc. is included in the ‘banding’ process. In South Africa Source Rank 1 would be Sunday Times, Daily Sun, iol.co.za and news24.com, as examples.

Source rank thus takes into account the following factors that are critical for the measurement of success of a PR campaign, as identified by the Public Relations Institute of South Africa (PRISA):

Was the intended message conveyed through:

  • Company Name Mention
  • Product / Brand mention
  • Photo / Image
  • Spokesperson quote
  • Credibility of Spokesperson
  • Were the intended target audiences reached?
  • Prominence in broadcast or publication
  • Competitor / peer inclusion (How did the organisation compare to the exposure given to competitors)
  • Call to action opportunity for stakeholders to act on the message e.g. website, hotline no, ticket sales)

“DDI has many global alliances and are trying to educate the South African market to advance to the same level of global measurement.” Says Khoury: “Many of the brands we deal with are international and Source Rank now offers these clients the ability to measure South African coverage against anywhere else in the world.  Changing market tradition is always a tough call, so DDI includes AVE (however flawed) in our service offering. We do, however, hope that the market will move to global measurement over time.”

For illustrative purposes, we will look at a few examples of coverage that BMW received during the last few months in the South African media:

Background: The BMW Group is the world's leading provider of premium products and premium services for individual mobility.BMW’s biggest goal is to globally capture 8% percent of the automobile industry. BMW only pursues brand areas that are premium in nature, without any dilution of the brand. The typical BMW driver is a male 27-65 who is interested in adventurous driving while maintaining a focus on luxury. This person belongs to the upper middle class.

Source

Heading

Value

Note

Measuring Remarks

TopGear

Night Shift: BMW 4-Series vs. rivals

 

Article focuses on BMW, but mentions 2 competitor brands in introductory paragraph

TopGear magazine has an LSM 6-10 and is aimed at a selective market (anyone with a passion for cars and motoring).

 

Citizen 4 December

Abramjee robbers in court

 

Only one mention of BMW (Abramjee’s BMW was stolen during robbery)

The Citizen has an LSM 2-10, but has a more mass market and tabloid appeal. This is a news item and the coverage can be regarded as neutral towards BMW, although the news report was negative. I would not consider the Citizen to be part of BMW’s ideal marketing mix, but we are dealing here with editorial, which is not paid for in this instance instead of advertorial, which is paid for.

IOL (Daily News) 4 December

MEC’s driver ‘ignored the safety’ of road users

 

One mention of BMW (driver of BMW) and another of the model (X5), although both incidental

The Daily News has a higher LSM (7-10) than that of the Citizen and will thus be more BMW’s market, but still not their ideal. As in the Abramjee report, the coverage for BMW was incidental and neutral. One has to keep in mind that with accidents, like these, news coverage can lead to severe negative publicity, as in the case when Toyota came under fire after Kurt Darren’s accident when their air bags did not deploy. The same can happen when a mechanical fault might have caused the accident (which was not true in the case of this clip).

Allafrica.com11 November

SA strike season: Union Blaming Misses the Point

 

Discussion of strikes in South Africa, with 1 paragraph focusing on BMW’s decision to not further invest in a new production line in South Africa.

This clip has to be viewed, keeping in mind negative (but understandable) press towards BMW preceding this news item. This news item could lead to negative perceptions regarding the BMW brand in South Africa.

Top Gear 11 November

BMW’s blown V8 M3

 

Full article focuses on the BMW vehicle

This article is a PR person’s dream, in one of South Africa’s top motoring publications, aimed at the exclusive motoring audience. Coverage during this article was positive, with no other competitor brands mentioned.

Daily News

Ipsos ranks 2013’s best quality cars

 

Three of BMW’s models were listed in the article, although article was about the ranks

Although a news item and although BMW received mere mention, within the context of the topic (Ipsos survey), the publicity generated by this clip was extremely positive, which could boost the image of the brand in South Africa.



Total Words: 1298