Guardian Angels for the Minority in South African Companies
Submitted by: Thandi Makasi, SchoemanLaw Save to InstapaperThere are decisions in a company require the shareholders of the company to vote on. Such decisions will be based on the majority votes of the shareholders, typically arrived at during a shareholder’s meeting. But what happens when a shareholder feels prejudiced by the majority’s conduct?
Oppression Remedies
When a minority shareholder of a company feels like the majority’s decisions regarding the operation of the company have caused unfair prejudice to them, they may approach the court in terms of s163 of the Companies 71 of 2008, as amended (hereafter the “Act”) for relief.
The member seeking to invoke s163 of the Act must make an application to the court wherein they will be required to prove that the decision which they are challenging is either, prejudicial, oppressive or unfairly disregards their interests. In the case of Grancy Property (Pty) Ltd v Manala and Others 2013, the court stated that when determining the alleged oppressive conduct, the court must look at the conduct itself and the effect that it had on the other members. Where the conduct is alleged to have financial implications, an objective test is used, and objective evidence proving that a financial loss was suffered is required.
Who May Rely on s163?
An application alleging that the conduct of a company was oppressive does not only have to be made by the company’s shareholders. Subsection 1 of the Act states that both directors and shareholders may rely on this section for relief.
Available Remedies
Now that we have established how s163 works, here is a list of the remedies available if your application is successful:
An order restraining the oppressive conduct;An order appointing a liquidator if the company is insolvent;An order placing the company under supervision and beginning business rescue process;An order directing the company to amend its Memorandum of Incorporation or Shareholders Agreement;An order directing an issue or redistribution of shares;An order appointing additional directors;An order directing the company to a repay a shareholder any part of the consideration that the shareholder paid for shares, or pay the equivalent value, with or without conditions;An order changing or setting aside a transaction or an agreement which the company has concluded and compensating the company or other party involved;An order compensating an aggrieved person; orAn order for the trial of any issue as determined by the court.
Conclusion
Section 163 of the Companies Act prevents oppressive conduct of majority shareholders. An application in terms of s163 of the Act requires the determination of the conduct which is considered oppressive and the effect which that conduct had. A successful application allows the court to issue an order which either prevents the continued conduct or compensates the aggrieved party.
Contact an attorney at SchoemanLaw Inc for your commercial law needs!
Geffen and Others v Martin and Others [2018] 1 All SA 21 (WCC).
Contact us:
https://outlook.office365.com/owa/calendar/SchoemanLawInc@schoemanlaw.co.za/bookings/
www.schoemanlaw.co.za
SchoemanLaw Inc Attorneys, Conveyancers and Notaries Public is a boutique law firm offering its clients access to high quality online legal documents and agreements, together with a wide range of legal services. The firm has an innovative and entrepreneurial mindset that distinguishes it from other law firms. We apply our first-hand understanding of the challenges facing entrepreneurs (regardless of their business size) to develop proven, practical solutions incorporating legal compliance, risk aversion and business sense. We achieve this by offering clients tailored, yet holistic support comprising of legal gap analysis, the design of tailored legal solutions and the practical implementation thereof through training and automation. With your personal interests in mind, our ultimate aim is to implement measures that protect the results of your hard work as effectively as possible.
Latest Press Articles
- Bridging Work and Home - A Conveyancing Approach to Employee Tenancies.
- Suretyships in Commercial Contracts - What Every Business Should Know
- Navigating South Africa’s Labour Law Reform - Proposed Amendments to the Labour Relations Act
- Review Applications in South African Labour Law - Legal Constraints and Procedural Discipline
- Parental Alienation in South Africa - A Silent Form of Emotional Abuse in Family Law Disputes
- Market Trust Starts Inside - Aligning Your Legal Documents with Your Marketing Message
- Exploring Suretyship - Capacity, Liabilities, and Types of Sureties.
- The "Without Prejudice" Rule Under Fire - Recent Developments in South African Law
- Navigating the Storm - How Rule 43 and Rule 58 Applications Provide a Lifeline During Divorce
- Beyond the Traditional - Execution of Judgments Through Attachment of Bank Accounts
- Guardianship vs Custody in South Africa - What Parents Need to Know When Travelling Abroad with a Minor
- What steps can I take if someone registers a domain name that is too similar to mine?
- Understanding the Revised Automotive Aftermarket Guidelines for Competition (R2R)
- Considering Artificial Intelligence, the responsibility of Employee management
- Mistake, Misrepresentation, and Duress - When Can a Business Escape a Contract?
The Pulse Updates
- New Report Reveals Msme Funding Realities In South Africa – And What Must Change (May 30, 2025)
- Opinion Piece: Incorporating Ai Into Workforce Planning (May 26, 2025)
- Bridging The Gap: Why Finance And Hr Must Collaborate For Business Success (May 19, 2025)
- Reclaiming Johannesburg’s Running Narrative Powered By The Streets. Refreshed By Pura. (May 16, 2025)
- Double Gold Triumph For Hansgrohe Innovations (May 16, 2025)